CFS: Government May Fund Chelation Study for Autism

Discussion in 'Fibromyalgia Main Forum' started by Slayadragon, Jul 8, 2008.

  1. Slayadragon

    Slayadragon New Member

    I bring this up because of: a) the belief of some that autism and CFS have similar mechanisms or are the same disease (manifested differently because of the patients' ages), b) the Yasko program also has the goal of removing mercury from the body (though through a different mechanism than chelation), and c) the methylation support used by many on this board is related to the Yasko approach.

    I've only heard of a few people on this board having used chelation. I wonder if they feel it did them any good.


    Fringe autism treatment could get federal study
    By CARLA K. JOHNSON, Associated Press Writer

    2 hours, 7 minutes ago

    Pressured by desperate parents, government researchers are pushing to test an unproven treatment on autistic children, a move some scientists see as an unethical experiment in voodoo medicine.

    The treatment removes heavy metals from the body and is based on the fringe theory that mercury in vaccines triggers autism — a theory never proved and rejected by mainstream science. Mercury hasn't been in childhood vaccines since 2001, except for certain flu shots.

    But many parents of autistic children are believers, and the head of the National Institute of Mental Health supports testing it on children provided the tests are safe.

    "So many moms have said, `It's saved my kids,'" institute director Dr. Thomas Insel said.

    For now, the proposed study, not widely known outside the community of autism research and advocacy groups, has been put on hold because of safety concerns, Insel told The Associated Press.

    The process, called chelation, is used to treat lead poisoning. Studies of adults have shown it to be ineffective unless there are high levels of metals in the blood. Any study in children would have to exclude those with high levels of lead or mercury, which would require treatment and preclude using a placebo.

    One of the drugs used for chelation, DMSA, can cause side effects including rashes and low white blood cell count. And there is evidence chelation may redistribute metals in the body, perhaps even into the central nervous system.

    "I don't really know why we have to do this in helpless children," said Ellen Silbergeld of Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health, who was invited to comment on the study to a review board of the national institute.

    Despite lawsuits and at least one child's death, several thousand autistic children are already believed to be using chelation (pronounced kee-LAY'-shun), their parents not content to wait for a study.

    Among those parents is Christina Blakey of suburban Chicago, who uses chelation and a variety of other alternative therapies, including sessions in a hyperbaric chamber, on her 8-year-old son, Charlie.

    Before he started chelation at age 5, Charlie suffered tantrums. When she took him to school, she had to peel him off her body and walk away. But three weeks after he began chelation, his behavior changed, she said.

    "He lined up with his friends at school. He looked at me and waved and gave me a thumbs-up sign and walked into school," Blakey said. "All the moms who had been watching burst into tears. All of us did."

    There is no way to prove whether chelation made a difference or whether Charlie simply adjusted to the school routine.

    Autism is a spectrum of disorders that hamper a person's ability to communicate and interact with others. Most doctors believe there is no cure.

    Conventional treatments are limited to behavioral therapy and a few medications, such as the schizophrenia drug Risperdal, approved to treat irritability.

    Frustrated parents use more than 300 alternative treatments, most with little or no scientific evidence backing them up, according to the Interactive Autism Network at the Kennedy Krieger Institute in Baltimore, Md.

    "With a lot of mothers, if they hear about a treatment, they feel like they need to try it," said project director Dr. Paul Law. "Anything that has a chance of benefiting their child, they're willing to give it a shot."

    More than 2 percent of the children tracked by the project use chelation. If that figure holds for the general population, it would mean more than 3,000 autistic children are on the treatment at any time in the United States.

    Chelation drugs can be taken in pill form, by rectal suppository and intravenously.

    Dr. Susan Swedo, who heads the federal institute's in-house autism research and wants to study chelation, gained notoriety by theorizing that strep throat had caused some cases of obsessive compulsive disorder. The theory was never proved.

    She proposed recruiting 120 autistic children ages 4 to 10 and giving half DMSA and the other half a dummy pill. The 12-week test would measure before-and-after blood mercury levels and autism symptoms.

    The study outline says that failing to find a difference between the two groups would counteract "anecdotal reports and widespread belief" that chelation works.

    But the study was put on hold for safety concerns after an animal study, published last year, linked DMSA to lasting brain problems in rats. It remains under review, Insel told the AP.

    Insel said he has come to believe after listening to parents that traditional scientific research, building incrementally on animal studies and published papers, wasn't answering questions fast enough.

    "This is an urgent set of questions," Insel said. "Let's make innovation the centerpiece of this effort as we study autism, its causes and treatments, and think of what we may be missing."

    Last year, the National Institutes of Health spent less than 5 percent of its $127 million autism research budget on alternative therapies, Insel said. He said he is hopeful the chelation study will be approved.

    Others say it would be unethical, even if it proves chelation doesn't work.

    Federal research agencies must "bring reason to science" without "catering to a public misperception," said Dr. Paul Offit, chief of infectious diseases at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and author of an upcoming book on autism research. "Science has been trumped by politics in some ways."

    Offit is concerned vaccination rates may fall to dangerous levels because some parents believe they cause autism.

    Dr. Martin Myers, former director of the federal National Vaccine Program Office, said he believes giving chelation to autistic children is unethical — but says the government can justify the study because so many parents are using chelation without scientific evidence.

    "It's incumbent on the scientific community to evaluate it," he said.

    Actress Jenny McCarthy, whose bestseller "Louder Than Words" details her search for treatments for her autistic son, Evan, told thousands of parents at a recent autism conference outside Chicago that she plans to try chelation on him this summer.

    "A lot of people are scared to chelate ... but it has triggered many recoveries," she said.

    But those claims are only anecdotal, and there are serious risks.

    Of the several drugs used in chelation, the only one recommended for intravenous use in children is edetate calcium disodium. Mixups with another drug with a similar name, edetate disodium, have led to three deaths, including one autistic child.

    A 5-year-old autistic boy went into cardiac arrest and died after he was given IV chelation therapy in 2005. A Pennsylvania doctor is being sued by the boy's parents for allegedly giving the wrong drug and using a risky technique.

    No deaths have been associated with DMSA, which can cause rashes, low white blood cell count and vomiting. It is also sold as a dietary supplement, which is how some parents of autistic children get it.

    A Food and Drug Administration spokeswoman said the agency is "is looking into how these products are marketed."


    On the Net:

    National Institute of Mental Health:

  2. acer2000

    acer2000 New Member

    Well heres hoping the protocol they use is Dr. Cutlers. I think many of the problems people have had in the past have been due to chelation protocols that were dangerous or not well thought out. If they are going to fund a study, they might as well use the safest and most effective protocol - Dr. Cutlers. Otherwise it will be easy for them to hold up the study and say it doesn't work.
  3. Forebearance

    Forebearance Member

    Wow, I'm glad they're thinking about doing this study.

    But hmmm, maybe they should try it on people over 18 first, so the participants can give informed consent.

    I would be scared to try chelation on myself. I think it would be too strong for me.

    Good point, A.

    Thanks for sharing this, Lisa!

    [This Message was Edited on 07/09/2008]
  4. marti_zavala

    marti_zavala Member

    I have gone through chelation therapy. I found it extremely benefical but it is not for everyone.

    I had already had my amalgams removed properly. I had good bowel and kidney function and was actively detoxing myself on a regular basis with caffeine enemas, etc.

    I still have not reviewed Dr. Cutler protocol but have heard many good things. I would use double thiol chelators to soak up what DMSA did not get or recirculated.

    I did not do that when I went through my treatments but I do not feel that I was harmed, nor do I feel that mercury went to my brain (it may have but I have not noticed the effects) if anything, my brain is better now then when I first got sick.

    Here is the only thing wrong with this study - the young autistic people have few communication skills - how will they tell their parents that they don't feel good. My son would help me remember to take such and such and to think through any detox to know what to administer. Charcoal vs bentonite, etc. Also, sounds like they are excluding kids with high mercury or lead - well, duh, those are the kids that need to be in the study. sigh....

  5. Lichu3

    Lichu3 New Member

    I'd like to see the consent form on this one :) .........whoever writes it is going to have a fun time.

    Many drugs used in kids have gone through less rigorous testing because of the issue of consent. Parents can consent but there's the concern that kids don't really have much of a say on something which might have long-term consequences. Drug data on kids often derived from adults.

    The problem is if legitimate, well-trained researchers do nothing, then the questions don't get answered. Could they start by looking at kids who are already getting chelation and tracking them first?

    Marti: what the article means is that if the kids are shown to have high level of metals in their blood by standardized tests (regardless of autism or not), they NEED to be treated since there are standardized treatments for this situation.

    Putting them in a study, where they might get a placebo and not treatment, would be unethical.

[ advertisement ]