New paper on clinical study of methylation treatment (VERY LONG!)

Discussion in 'Fibromyalgia Main Forum' started by richvank, Mar 17, 2009.

  1. richvank

    richvank New Member

    Hi, all.

    Here is one of the poster papers I presented at the IACFS/ME conference last weekend in Reno. Sorry that the tables are disordered and the figures don't transmit. If you want to see the paper as it actually looks, with tables and figures, you can find it in the files section of the webpage for the yahoo cfs_yasko group.

    I will try to answer questions on the study if you have some.


    Treatment Study of Methylation Cycle Support in Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia


    Neil Nathan, M.D.
    Richard A. Van Konynenburg, Ph.D.

    9th International IACFS/ME Conference
    Reno, Nevada

    March 12-15, 2009


    At the 2007 conference of the IACFS, one of us (RVK) proposed a hypothesis for the pathogenesis of CFS, called the Glutathione Depletion—Methylation Cycle Block hypothesis [1].

    This hypothesis is based on research that had been done by James et al. in autism [2], and a recognition of similarities between the biochemical abnormalities in autism and those in CFS. Deth et al. [3] have published a somewhat similar hypothesis for autism.

    Shortly after the conference, with the help of a CFS patient (name withheld to protect privacy), RVK extracted part of the comprehensive treatment program developed by Amy Yasko, Ph.D., N.D., for autism and adult neurological diseases [4], and suggested the use of the resulting seven supplements for treating CFS. Initial experience with this treatment led to a further reduction to five supplements.

    After obtaining some positive clinical experience with the five-supplement protocol in his private practice, one of us (NN) proposed this treatment study to evaluate it in a more controlled manner. Funding for lab testing was obtained from a private source.


    1. To test the Glutathione Depletion—Methylation Cycle Block hypothesis for CFS

    2. To assess the potential efficacy of a nonpharmacologic treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) that is based on this hypothesis and is designed to support the methylation cycle.

    Review of the Glutathione Depletion—Methylation Cycle Block (GD-MCB) Hypothesis for the Pathogenesis of CFS [1]

    • An individual inherits a genetic predisposition (polymorphisms in several of certain genes) toward developing CFS. (This genetic factor is more important for the sporadic cases than for the cluster cases of CFS.)

    • The person then experiences some combination of a variety of possible stressors (physical, chemical, biological, and/or psychological/emotional) that place demands on glutathione.

    • Glutathione levels drop, producing oxidative stress, removing protection from cobalamin (vitamin B12) and allowing toxins to accumulate.

    • Toxins react with cobalamin, lowering the rate of formation of methylcobalamin.

    • Lack of sufficient methylcobalamin inhibits the activity of methionine synthase, placing a partial block in the methylation and folate cycles.

    • Sulfur metabolites drain excessively through the transsulfuration pathway to form cysteine.

    • Much of the cysteine is oxidized to cystine because of the state of oxidative stress, and is therefore not available for the synthesis of glutathione. An alternative pathway initiated with catalysis by cystathionine gamma lyase carries the cystine on to form hydrogen sulfide and thiosulfate, and the latter is excreted in the urine.

    • An interaction (vicious circle) is established between the partial block in the methylation cycle and glutathione depletion, and the disorder therefore becomes chronic.

    • A wide range of symptoms results from these chronic abnormalities in the basic biochemistry of the cells.

    • The dysfunction of the detoxication system and the immune system that results from this combination allows toxins and infections to accumulate over time, which increasingly produce effects of their own.

    • Treatment should be directed primarily at increasing the activity of methionine synthase. The resulting normalization of the methylation cycle, the folate metabolism and glutathione levels will restore function to the immune system and the detoxication system as well as to a wide range of other parts of the overall biochemistry.

    • It can be expected that die-off of pathogens and mobilization of stored toxins will initially produce some exacerbation of symptoms, but improvements will be experienced as the body burdens of toxins and active infections are decreased.

    Characteristics of this Study

    Type: Open-label clinical study

    Setting: A single private practice in Springfield, Missouri

    Informed consent: Patients signed forms after explanation of the study and its possible risks.

    Duration of treatment: Six months (However, note that after the 6-month study period, individualized treatments were added to the basic protocol for an additional 3 months. Outcomes after this final period were not analyzed as part of the study, because treatments were not uniform during the final period.)

    Outcome measures: Objective testing and self-rating of symptoms (Details are given later in this paper.)

    Restrictions on medications and additional supplements: None, except that they and their dosages were not to be changed during the study without the knowledge and agreement of one of us (NN).


    Number: Thirty patients who presented sequentially to the practice of one of us (NN) were started on the treatment. One dropped out at three months for a reason unrelated to response to the treatment. The remaining 29 patients were treated for the six-month uniform-protocol period of this study. Of these 29 patients, eight did not meet the selection criteria (see below). Therefore, 21 patients were included in the statistical analysis of the results for the six-month period.

    Selection criteria: Those selected to be included in the statistical analysis of results were required to satisfy the Fukuda et al. 1994 case definition for CFS [5] and were also required to have experienced post-exertional fatigue and malaise. They were not required to meet the American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for fibromyalgia [6], but 18 of the 21 patients who were selected for the statistical analysis also met these criteria.

    Sex: All female

    Ethnicity: All Caucasian

    Ages: 33 to 84 (mean—52) years

    Durations of illness: 1 to 20+ years

    Additional diagnoses:
    Migraine headaches—15 patients
    Irritable bowel syndrome—13
    Chronic sinus infections—11
    Restless leg syndrome—5
    Mononucleosis (Epstein—Barr virus)—5
    Mold exposure and/or toxicity—5
    Multiple chemical sensitivity—4
    Lyme disease (previously treated)—2
    Interstitial cystitis—1
    Mycoplasma infections—1
    Chronic vulvitis—0

    Histories of previous treatment: These patients had exhibited partial response to treatment ranging from one to twelve years in duration with a protocol that included evaluation and treatment of adrenal, thyroid and sex hormones; food allergies; intestinal dysbiosis; heavy metal toxicity; infections (EBV, Lyme disease, mycoplasma); mold exposure; magnesium deficiency; and other nutritional imbalances.

    Initial General Questionnaire

    The patients were given an initial questionnaire that requested the following information:

    Starting date of treatment
    Date of birth
    Family history of these conditions (yes or no?), if so, which relatives?
    Date of onset of symptoms
    Sudden onset (yes or no?)
    Cause of onset, if known
    Date of diagnosis of chronic fatigue
    Date of diagnosis of fibromyalgia
    Other diagnoses (listed in previous section above)
    Current medications
    Current supplements

    The initial general questionnaire also included questions to ascertain whether the patients met the Fukuda et al. case definition for CFS [5] and the ACR criteria for fibromyalgia [6], and whether they had experienced post-exertional fatigue and malaise.

    Supplement Protocol

    The treatment protocol used in this study was extracted from the full treatment program developed by Yasko for the treatment of autism and adult neurological diseases [4]. It consisted of five supplements:

    1. FolaPro [7] (5-methyl tetrahydrofolate): ¼ tablet (200mcg) daily
    2. Intrinsi B12/folate [8]: ¼ tablet daily (Combination of [folic acid, 5-methyl tetrahydrofolate, and folinic acid] (200 mcg), cyanocobalamin (125 mcg), calcium (22.5 mg), phosphorus (17.25 mg), and intrinsic factor (5 mg) )
    3. General Vitamin Neurological Health Formula [9] (a multivitamin, multimineral supplement including antioxidants, trimethylglycine, nucleotides, supplements to support the sulfur metabolism, a high ratio of magnesium to calcium, and no iron or copper): starting with ¼ tablet and increasing the dosage as tolerated, to 2 tablets daily
    4. Phosphatidyl Serine Complex [10] (phospholipids and fatty acids): 1 softgel capsule daily
    5. Activated B12 Guard [11] (hydroxocobalamin): 1 sublingual lozenge (2,000 micrograms) daily

    Objective Testing

    1. Methylation pathways panel [12]:
    (performed initially and at 3 and 6 months) This panel was the main objective diagnostic used in this study. It evaluates the status of glutathione, the methylation cycle and the folate metabolism, and was used to determine the effects of the treatment on these aspects of the metabolism. This panel includes the following:

    Glutathione (plasma)
    Oxidized glutathione (plasma)
    Adenosine (plasma)
    S-adenosylmethionine (RBC)
    S-adenosylhomocysteine (RBC)
    5-methyl tetrahydrofolate (plasma)
    10-formyl tetrahydrofolate (plasma)
    5-formyl tetrahydrofolate (plasma)
    Tetrahydrofolate (plasma)
    Folic acid (plasma)
    Folinic acid (whole blood)
    Folic acid (RBC)

    It is important to note that the sample collection kit for this panel incorporates enzyme inhibitors to prevent the reduced form of glutathione from oxidizing during shipping and storage of samples. This is necessary because glutathione readily oxidizes after removal from the body.

    2. Thyroid panel (TSH, total T4, total T3) [13]: (performed initially and at 3 months). Thyroid peroxidase antibody was also measured initially and again at 6 months, if found to be positive. These tests were run to document hypo- or hyperthyroidism and to test for Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Also, it was desired to determine whether the treatment would correct hypothyroidism, as had been reported anecdotally in a small number of cases treated prior to this study.

    3. Other Objective Testing: Additional objective testing was performed primarily to further define the characteristics of the tested group in order to facilitate comparison to other patient groups. Another purpose was to assist in choosing individualized treatments for the additional three-month period of treatment beyond the six-month duration of this study. A third purpose was to determine whether the values of the tested parameters would correlate with the responses of the individual patients to the basic protocol, as a means of predicting the applicability of this treatment to other patients. The additional tests are described below, and the results are summarized later in this paper, but some of the analysis and application of these results will be carried out in the future.

    a. Characterization of polymorphisms associated with the methylation cycle [14]: (AHCY-01, BHMT-08, CBS C699T, COMT V158M, and MTR A2756G) (one time only).

    AHCY-01 is a polymorphism in the gene coding for the enzyme enzyme S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase, which catalyzes the removal of adenosine from S-adenosylhomocysteine to form homocysteine, in the methylation cycle.

    BHMT-08 is a polymorphism in the gene coding for the enzyme betaine homocysteine methyltransferase, which catalyzes an alternative pathway from homocysteine to methionine in the methylation cycle in the liver and kidneys.

    CBS C699T is a polymorphism in the gene coding for the enzyme cystathionine beta synthase, which catalyzes the reaction of homocysteine with serine to form cystathionine, at the junction between the methylation cycle and the transsulfuration pathway.

    COMT V158M is a polymorphism in the gene coding for the enzyme catechol-O-methyltransferase, which uses methyl groups from S-adenosylmethionine in the methylation cycle to assist in the metabolism of catecholamines and estrogens.

    MTR A2756G is a polymorphism in the gene coding for the enzyme methionine synthase, which catalyzes the reaction of homocysteine and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate to form methionine and tetrahydrofolate, at the junction of the methylation and folate cycles.

    These polymorphisms were characterized in response to the work by Yasko [15], who uses polymorphism data to tailor the treatment of individual patients.

    c. Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) DR DQ typing [16]: (one time only, on 20 of the patients). This panel characterizes inherited polymorphisms in the genes that code for the Class II human leukocyte antigen molecules. These molecules are membrane proteins that are used by cells to display peptide antigens for recognition by helper T cells. This panel was run in response to the work reported by Shoemaker el al. [17] of correlations between particular HLA genotypes and susceptibility to mold illness, Lyme disease and other biotoxin-related disorders that can be associated with CFS.

    d. Functional Acuity Contrast Testing (FACT) [18]: (performed initially and at 3 and 6 months). This is a vision test conducted with eye charts that measures the ability to sense contrast over a range of scales in images. This test was run also in response to the work of Shoemaker [16], who finds it to be a sensitive diagnostic for the presence of neurotoxins in the brain, which occurs in biotoxin-related disorders.

    e. C4a [19]: (performed at 6 months). C4a is a product of the splitting of the C4 protein as a result of activation of the complement system. The complement system is a collection of circulating and cell membrane proteins that play important roles in host defense against microbes and in antibody-mediated tissue injury. C4a stimulates inflammation. This test was added later in the study in response to the work of Shoemaker et al. [20] and Stricker et al. [21], indicating respectively that its elevation is associated with acute and chronic Lyme disease. Earlier work by Sorenson et al. [22] had also shown elevation of C4a in CFS patients in response to exercise.

    f. TGF beta-1 [23]: (performed at 6 months). Transforming growth factor beta-1 is a member of the TGF beta family. These are cytokines produced by activated T cells, mononuclear phagocytes, and other cells, whose principal actions are to inhibit the proliferation and differentiation of T cells, to inhibit the activation of macrophages, and to counteract the effects of proinflammatory cytokines [24]. This test was added later in the study in response to the work of Shoemaker [25]. Earlier measurements of TGF beta or TGF beta-1 in CFS patients have been reported by Chao et al. [26], Peterson et al. [27], MacDonald et al. [28], Bennett et al. [29], Shin et al. [30], Kennedy et al. [31], and Tomoda et al. [32].

    Enumeration of Symptoms and Self-Rating of Outcome Measures

    The patients were asked to mark their symptoms on a checklist (initially and at 6 months) that included 38 symptoms (see appendix). The patients were also asked to rate five outcome measures initially and at 3 and 6 months on visual analog scales ranging from 1 to 10. These measures consisted of energy, sleep, mental clarity, freedom from pain, and overall feeling of wellbeing. In addition, at 3 and 6 months they were asked to estimate their percentage of improvement.

    Conduct of the Clinical Study

    The clinical study was conducted by one of us (NN) in his private practice, with the help of administrative and nursing staff.

    The study was explained to each of the patients, including the purposes, the protocol, and the possible risks. Each patient signed an informed consent and responded to the initial general questionnaire.

    The patients were supplied with the supplements in the protocol at cost.

    The patients were given the following instructions with respect to the supplement protocol:

    • The first two supplement tablets are difficult to break into quarters. We recommend that you obtain (from any pharmacy) a good-quality pill splitter to assist with this process. They can, alternatively, be crushed into powders, then separated on a flat surface, and the powders can be mixed together. They can be taken orally with water, with or without food.
    • Occasionally these can make patients sleepy, so some take them at bedtime. They can be taken any time of day, with or without food.
    • GO SLOWLY. Occasionally, as the methylation cycle blockages are released, toxins are released and processed by the body, and this can lead to an exacerbation of symptoms. IF THIS HAPPENS, try smaller doses, every other day. SLOWLY work up to the full dosages. If you have questions, please call our office to discuss them.

    The objective testing as described above was performed on the patients initially and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. After 3 and 6 months of treatment, they also responded to follow-up questionnaires that included general questions about response to treatment, a symptom checklist and self-rated visual analog scales for the outcome measures described earlier.

    As noted earlier, one patient dropped out of the study at 3 months for a reason not related to response to the treatment. The remaining 29 patients completed 6 months of treatment.


    Various patients reported some early exacerbation of symptoms, which in most cases was followed by a greater improvement in symptoms. Three of the patients found it necessary to decrease their dosage frequency to every second or third day for several days, until they could tolerate the full daily dosage schedule.

    Sixteen of 30 patients (53%) reported an initial worsening of symptoms, beginning in most of these cases within 3 or 4 days, but in some cases beginning at up to 2 weeks. Most of the symptoms were mild, and none of the patients discontinued usage of the supplements during the first 3 months. The most common side effects were gastrointestinal (pain, cramps, constipation, or diarrhea), reported by 6 out of 30 patients or 20%; increase in pain, reported by 4 out of 30 or 13%; and increase in fatigue, reported by 3 out of 30 or 10%. Other symptoms, reported by one patient each, were a decrease in appetite, poor sleep, weak legs, flu-like symptoms, and an increase in anxiety and depression.

    For those who experienced improvement, the time to self-reported improvement on the protocol was an average of 5.6 weeks, with a range from immediate improvement (which was rare) to as long as 8 weeks before improvement was experienced.

    Results of the methylation pathways panel are shown in Table 1.
    The numbers shown are mean values for 21 patients, with the standard deviations in parentheses (except that the values for one patient were omitted from the red blood cell folate
    Table 1. Methylation Pathways Panel Results

    value Time on treatment (months)
    0 3 6
    Glutathione (GSH) (plasma) (nmol/mL) 4.65
    (0.42) 3.31* (0.49) 3.97** (0.57) 4.34** (0.67)
    Glutathione (oxidized) (GSSG) (plasma) (nmol/mL) 0.33
    (0.09) 0.48* (0.15) 0.50 (0.14) 0.53
    Adenosine (plasma) (nmol/L) 191
    (11.5) 178 (80) 202
    (76) 221#
    S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) (RBC) (mcmol/dL) 238.5
    (8.8) 214*
    (20) 227****
    (16) 234**
    S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) (RBC) (mcmol/dL) 43.5
    (2.8) 45.8
    (13.2) 48.4
    (11.0) 51.7
    5-Methyl-tetrahydrofolate (plasma) (nmol/L) 8.4 to
    72.6 14.2
    (9.6) 17.2
    (10.2) 20.9***
    (plasma) (nmol/L) 4.8
    (1.7) 1.1*
    (0.5) 1.5****
    (0.5) 1.9***
    (plasma) (nmol/L) 6.4
    (2.6) 1.3*
    (1.4) 1.5
    (1.2) 2.0
    Tetrahydrofolate (plasma) (nmol/L) 3.7
    (1.6) 2.2*
    (1.8) 2.4
    (1.9) 3.2****
    Folic acid (plasma) (nmol/L) 16.8
    (3.9) 19.9
    (13.0) 24.0
    (12.2) 27.7****
    Folinic acid (whole blood)
    (nmol/L) 22.2
    (6.6) 9.1*
    (3.2) 10.4
    (3.1) 11.5****
    Folic acid (RBC)
    (nmol/L) 950
    (275) 427
    (109) 457
    (121) 476

    GSH / GSSG 14.1 7.48
    (2.47) 8.54
    (2.51) 8.75
    SAM / SAH 5.48 5.01
    (1.35) 4.93
    (1.10) 4.69
    Numbers shown in parentheses are standard deviations.
    * p<0.0005 with respect to the reference value.
    The following symbols indicate the p values of measured parameters with respect to their values at time 0: ** p<0.0005; *** p<0.005; **** p<0.02;
    # p<0.04.

    distributions, because of a clearly spurious value). The laboratory reference values shown in this table were determined by Vitamin Diagnostics, Inc. They are each based on measurements in at least 120 volunteer male and female medical students between the ages of 20 and 40, nonsmoking and with no known chronic diseases [33]. They are shown as mean values with standard deviations, except that the lab reference range is given for 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate. This folate vitamer’s reference range is quite broad, presumably because of variations between individuals in the prominence of the so-called folate trap phenomenon, in which lowered activity of methionine synthase causes 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate to leak out of cells into the blood plasma.

    The reference values for the ratios GSH/GSSG and SAM/SAH were calculated from the mean laboratory reference values of the parameters, but standard deviations for these ratios were not known. The p-values were determined using the one-tailed Student’s t distribution. Because the distributions of values for 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate and tetrahydrofolate were highly skewed, these values were transformed to their reciprocals before the statistical analysis was done on them, in order to obtain distributions more nearly normal. Note that folinic acid and 5-formyl-tetrahydrofolate are the same chemical species, measured both in plasma and in whole blood in this panel.

    As can be seen from the table, the initial mean values of glutathione (GSH), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), and four of the folate vitamers were significantly different from their laboratory reference values. In particular, GSH was significantly depleted, as was SAM.

    It can also be seen that significant increases in the levels of GSH, SAM and 10-formyl-tetrahydrofolate were observed after 3 months of treatment. After 6 months of treatment, significant increases were observed in GSH, adenosine, SAM, 5-methyl-tetrahydrofolate, 10-formyl-tetrahydrofolate, tetrahydrofolate, plasma folic acid and red blood cell folinic acid. Adenosine and plasma folic acid started below, and rose to values above, their laboratory reference values. The ratios GSH/GSSG and SAM/SAH were initially below their laboratory reference values. Although the former rose and the latter decreased during the treatment, these changes were not statistically significant.

    Glutathione is plotted in Figure 1, S-adenosylmethionine in Figure 2, and tetrahydrofolate in Figure 3.

    Time on treatment

    Figure 1. Plasma reduced glutathione in 21 CFS patients
    initially and after 3 and 6 months of treatment,
    compared to the laboratory reference range

    Time on treatment

    Figure 2. Plasma S-adenosylmethionine in 21 CFS patients
    initially and after 3 and 6 months of treatment,
    compared to the laboratory reference range

    Tetrahydrofolate is plotted because of its role as the hub of the folate metabolism. The coenzyme forms of folate are derived from it. Its level can therefore be used as a gauge of the degree of normalcy of the folate metabolism. Because its distribution is highly skewed, as noted earlier, the median values rather than the mean values are shown. After 6 months of treatment, though there was a large spread in the values, the mean value of tetrahydrofolate had risen significantly.

    Figure 3. Plasma tetrahydrofolate in 21 CFS patients
    initially and after 3 and 6 months of treatment,
    compared to the laboratory reference range

    As these figures show, glutathione, S-adenosylmethionine, and tetrahydrofolate all monotonically approached their laboratory reference values during the 6 months of treatment, but it appears that this period of treatment was not long enough for their mean values to reach the mean laboratory reference values. (As mentioned earlier, in fact treatment was continued for an additional 3 months, but since individualized treatments were added during this period, the results at 9 months were not included in the statistical analysis. It is interesting to note, however, that after 9 months of treatment the mean glutathione and SAM levels had reached and exceeded their laboratory reference values.)

    With regard to the thyroid testing, 10 of the 21 patients were on thyroid hormone supplementation at the beginning of the study, and remained on it during the study. The initial total T3 levels were found to converge toward the mean reference value at 3 months, as seen in a shift in the mean and a decrease in the standard deviation. The initial and final mean and standard deviation values were 156.9 (48.9) and 136.1 (29.9) ng/dL, compared to the reference mean and standard deviation of 120.5 (30.2) ng/dL. This shift barely missed achieving the p<0.05 criterion of significance, but in 19 out of the 21 patients, the shift in total T3 was in the direction toward the reference mean. Two out of the 21 patients had elevated thyroid peroxidase antibodies initially. In one of them the level decreased significantly after 6 months of treatment, while the level in the other remained nearly the same.

    The allele frequencies of the polymorphisms associated with the methylation cycle in the group of 21 patients were as follows: AHCY-01: 17%; BHMT-08: 48%; CBS C699T: 38%; COMT V158M: 60%; and MTR A2756G: 19%. None of the patients was homozygous for AHCY-01 or MTR A2756G. There were both homozygous and heterozygous cases for the other three polymorphisms.

    Figure 4 shows the distributions of the values of the sum of S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocysteine (the two methylation cycle metabolites measured in this study) as a function of time on treatment for patients who do not have the CBS C699T polymorphism as well as those who are heterozygous and homozygous for it. As can be seen, those having either one or two copies of this polymorphism have lower values of SAM + SAH than those who do not have it. The differences are statistically significant (p<0.04) between the (-/-) and the (+/-) groups for all three times.

    Figure 4. Sum of SAM (RBC) and SAH (RBC) for patients who do not have the CBS C699T polymorphism (-/-), those who are heterozygous (+/-), and those who are homozygous (+/+), at 0, 3, and 6 months of treatment.

    The difference between the (-/-) and the (+/+) groups is statistically significant at 0 months (p<0.04), but not at 3 and 6 months. (Even though the sums of SAM and SAH were lower at all three times for the (+/+) group, there were only two patients in this group, so the statistical power was low in comparing it to the (-/-) group.)

    The HLA allele frequencies for the association categories identified by Shoemaker et al. [17] in 20 of the 21 patients for which these alleles were characterized were as follows: “Multisusceptible”-- 30%; “Mold”-- 28%; “Low MSH”-- 15%; and “Borrelia, Post Lyme Syndrome”-- 8%.

    The results of the Functional Acuity Contrast Testing (FACT) of 21 patients were as follows: clearly negative on all three tests (performed at 0, 3 and 6 months)—3; clearly positive on all three tests—8; positive or borderline on one or more of the three tests—10.

    The results of the C4a measurements were that 15 of 21 patients had values in excess of the laboratory reference range. The mean and standard deviation of the laboratory reference values were 1120 (381). The mean and standard deviation of the distribution of C4a values of the 21 patients were 6086 (7767). The patient values were significantly higher than the reference values, with p < 0.005.

    The results of the TGF beta-1 measurements were that 20 of 21 patients had values above the laboratory reference range. The mean and standard deviation of the laboratory reference range values were 1,363 (510). The mean and standard deviation of the distribution of TGF beta-1 values of the 21 patients was 6,935 (4,274). The patient values were significantly higher than the reference values, with p < 0.0005.

    In response to the question asking for a subjective estimate of percentage of improvement after 6 months of treatment, 15 out of 21 (71%) reported improvement, 5 reported no improvement (24%), and one did not respond. Of those who reported a percentage of improvement, the percentages ranged from 5 to 98%, with a mean value of 47.5% and a standard deviation of 25%.

    In response to the symptoms checklist, twenty out of 21 patients (95%) reported a decrease in their number of symptoms at 6 months, compared to their number at the start of treatment, and one reported an increase from 19 to 20 symptoms.

    In the self-rating of outcome measures at 6 months, 16 of 21 (76%) reported improvement in energy, 16 of 21 (76%) reported improvement in sleep, 15 of 21 (71%) reported improvement in mental clarity, 15 of 21 (71%) reported greater freedom from pain, and 14 of 21 (67%) reported improvement in their overall feeling of wellbeing.

    Table 2. Enumeration of Symptoms
    and Self-Rating of Outcome Measures

    Time on treatment (months)
    0 3 6
    Number of
    symptoms 22.1
    (6.2) -- 11.8**

    (rated from
    1 to 10)
    Energy 4.0
    (1.7) 5.8***
    (2.0) 6.0***
    Sleep 4.6
    (1.6) 5.7##
    (2.2) 6.4***
    clarity 5.0
    (2.0) 6.3#
    (2.0) 6.7***
    from pain 4.3
    (1.8) 5.6****
    (1.9) 5.8****
    feeling of
    wellbeing 4.5
    (1.3) 6.7**
    (1.9) 6.3***
    The following symbols indicate the p values of measured parameters with respect to their values at time 0: ** p<0.0005; *** p<0.005; **** p<0.02;
    # p<0.025; ## p<0.04

    Results of statistical analysis of the enumeration of symptoms and the self-rating of outcome measures are shown in Table 2 as mean values and standard deviations, and are plotted in Figures 5 through 10.

    Figure 5. Number of symptoms reported by 21 patients before and after 6 months of treatment

    Figure 6. Self-rated energy level for 21 patients, initially and after 3 and 6 months of treatment

    As can be seen, the mean number of symptoms reported by the patients dropped by nearly half after 6 months of treatment, and the mean ratings of all five of the symptomatic outcome measures were significantly improved at both 3 months and 6 months of treatment. The rating of overall feeling of wellbeing decreased between 3 and 6 months, but this decrease was not statistically significant.

    Figure 7. Self-rated amount of sleep for 21 patients, initially and after 3 and 6 months of treatment

    Figure 8. Self-rated mental clarity for 21 patients, initially and after 3 and 6 months of treatment

    Figure 9. Self-rated freedom from pain for 21 patients, initially and after 3 and 6 months of treatment

    Figure 10. Self-rated overall feeling of wellbeing for 21 patients, initially and after 3 and 6 months of treatment


    The objectives of this study were to test the Glutathione Depletion—Methylation Cycle Block hypothesis and to assess the potential efficacy of a treatment based upon it.

    The hypothesis predicts that CFS patients are depleted in glutathione and have a partial block in their linked methylation cycle and folate metabolism. It furthermore predicts that the abnormalities in glutathione, methylation, and the folate metabolism are linked together, and that the key to correcting these abnormalities is to stimulate the activity of the enzyme methionine synthase.

    The reduced glutathione level in the blood plasma was found to be significantly depleted in the patients before the treatment was begun, which is consistent with the hypothesis. It is important to consider how this result compares to past reports of measurements of glutathione in CFS patients. Some background information may be helpful in making this comparison:

    Glutathione is present in all cells of the body, and in the blood plasma, the bile and the epithelial lining fluid of the lungs, but is compartmentalized, having different concentrations in different locations in the body. Of most interest in testing the GD-MCB hypothesis would be the levels of reduced glutathione inside the cells that are most closely associated with the symptoms of CFS, particularly those of the skeletal muscles, the heart muscle, the brain and nervous system, the immune system, and glands that secrete hormones found to be deficient in CFS.

    However, though muscle biopsies can be performed, the most practical medium for clinical testing is blood. Within blood, the concentration of glutathione is about three orders of magnitude higher in the red blood cells than in the blood plasma, and it is also much easier to evaluate the glutathione level in whole blood or in red blood cells than in plasma. As a result, this is what has most commonly been done. Because of the great abundance of red blood cells in whole blood and the much higher concentration of glutathione in red blood cells than in plasma, the whole blood glutathione level is dominated by the red blood cell glutathione, so that a whole blood measurement of glutathione is essentially equivalent to a measurement of red blood cell glutathione.

    In evaluating the relevance of measurements of glutathione in red blood cells or whole blood to CFS, it is necessary to consider to what degree these measurements reflect the levels of glutathione inside the cells that are actually of interest. Red blood cells normally have excess capacity for producing glutathione, and they are net exporters of it, as are the cells of the liver [34]. Red blood cells have systemic roles to play in controlling oxidative stress and in conjugating toxins in addition to controlling their own redox status, and this probably accounts for their excess capacity.

    This is in contrast to the situation of the cells of interest, which are net users of glutathione. These cells utilize reduced glutathione from the blood plasma, or cysteine or cystine that originated in glutathione, and they export oxidized glutathione when the amounts are in excess of their abilities to recycle it [35]. As a result, the levels of reduced and oxidized glutathione in the blood plasma can be expected to more closely reflect the glutathione status in the cells of interest than will the levels in the red blood cells. The overall system of producing and distributing glutathione in the body should be kept in mind when comparing the present glutathione measurements in blood plasma to literature reports of past glutathione measurements in red blood cells or whole blood in CFS patients.

    With this background, here is a brief review of the relevant literature:

    In 1999, Droge and Holm [36] suggested that CFS is among several “low cystine and low glutamine syndromes” in which glutathione is depleted.

    Also in 1999, Cheney reported in public talks that glutathione depletion was “almost universal” in his CFS patients [37,38]. Enlander [39] and Salvato [40] had also been treating CFS patients with glutathione for some years at that time.

    In 2000, four papers were published reporting measurements of glutathione in CFS patients. Richards et al. [41,42] found that the patients they studied could be divided into two distinct groups, one having significantly elevated erythrocyte (red blood cell) reduced glutathione relative to a healthy control group, and the other having significantly lower values than the control group. Manuel y Keenoy et al. [43] found that a subgroup of fatigued patients having low magnesium, which did not improve with supplementation, had significantly low erythrocyte glutathione levels. Fulle et al. [44] found elevated total (reduced plus oxidized) glutathione in skeletal muscle biopsy specimens.

    In 2001, Manuel y Keenoy at al. [45] reported that they did not find a significant difference between CFS patients and non-CFS fatigued controls in terms of whole blood glutathione.

    In 2003, Kurup and Kurup [46] reported finding significantly lower erythrocyte reduced glutathione in myalgic encephalomyelitis patients compared to healthy controls.

    In 2005, Kennedy et al. [47] reported finding low red blood cell glutathione in a subset of CFS patients who had cardiovascular risk factors of obesity and hypertension, but not in a subset who did not have these risk factors. Also in 2005, Jammes et al. [48] did not find a significant difference between the resting erythrocyte reduced glutathione levels in CFS patients and controls.

    In 2007, Richards et al. [49] also reported finding no significant difference in erythrocyte reduced glutathione levels between CFS patients and controls.

    As can be seen, all but one of these reported measurements utilized red blood cells or whole blood, and they obtained a variety of results. The measurements using skeletal muscle biopsies measured total glutathione.

    It is our view that the present measurements of reduced glutathione in the blood plasma are more indicative of the reduced glutathione levels in the cells of interest in CFS than are the measurements reported in the literature, for the reasons discussed earlier.

    The observation that the level of reduced glutathione had risen by over 30% after six months of treatment, while the level of oxidized glutathione had risen by only 10% (the latter not statistically significant) suggests that the initial glutathione depletion was principally due to a deficit in its synthesis, rather than a deficit in its recycling via the glutathione reductase reaction.

    In other results in the present study, S-adenosylmethionine was found to be significantly low initially, suggesting dysfunction in the methylation cycle, and there were also significant initial abnormalities in several of the folate vitamers, indicating problems in the folate metabolism as well. These results are also consistent with the GD-MCB hypothesis.

    It can be seen from the results of the present study that treatment directed specifically at increasing the activity of methionine synthase brought significant improvement in S-adenosylmethionine and several folate vitamers. This is evidence that a partial block of this enzyme was responsible for the observed methylation cycle and folate cycle dysfunctions in CFS, as proposed in the GD-MCB hypothesis.

    It is particularly noteworthy that treatment directed at assisting the methylation cycle produced a significant increase in the level of glutathione, even though glutathione was not supplemented directly. This is evidence for a vicious circle type of interaction between these two phenomena, as predicted by the GD-MCB hypothesis, and as consistent with what was found earlier by James et al. in autism [2].

    As noted in the results above, the ratios GSH/GSSG and SAM/SAH were below normal initially and did not change significantly during the treatment period. A low value of GSH/GSSG indicates a state of oxidative stress, and a low value of SAM/SAH indicates lower than normal capacity for performing methylation reactions. The observation that these ratios remained low at the end of the 6-month period is evidence that
    the recovery is not yet complete at this time.

    The treatment was not found to completely correct hypothyroidism in this group of patients, though it had been reported to do so in a small number of patients prior to this study. However, the improvement in the values of total T3, the most active effector hormone in the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis, suggests that the treatment did act in the direction of normalizing the operation of this axis.

    The data concerning the polymorphisms associated with the methylation cycle as well as the HLA, FACT, C4a and TGF beta-1 data were used to help guide the choice of individualized treatment for the additional 3-month treatment period that was not part of the present analysis. They will also be used in the future to relate the patients who participated in this study to patient groups in other studies as well as to suggest how patient characteristics correlate with their response to this treatment.

    One interesting feature of the polymorphism data associated with the methylation cycle is the effect of the presence of the CBS C699T polymorphism on the levels of the metabolites in this cycle. Yasko [4] has claimed that this polymorphism increases the activity of cystathionine beta synthase, and thus causes the metabolites in the methylation cycle to drain more rapidly than normal into the transsulfuration pathway.
    According to Yasko, this depletes the methylation cycle when there is a partial block of methionine synthase, and it promotes excessive synthesis of toxic sulfur-containing species (such as sulfite) and ammonia if efforts are not made to compensate for it before support is given to the methylation cycle.

    The data in Figure 4 support Yasko’s claim that the CBS C699T polymorphism significantly drains metabolites from the methylation cycle when there is a partial block of methionine synthase. However, during the treatment, though there continued to be differences in the values of SAM +SAH between those who had the polymorphism and those who did not, even those who were homozygous for this polymorphism attained levels of SAM + SAH averaging near the reference value after 6 months of treatment, without compensatory treatment for the presence of this polymorphism. We did not measure sulfite or ammonia in this study, and we have not compared the symptomatic responses to treatment of those with the polymorphism to those without.

    As noted in the results above, the ratios GSH/GSSG and SAM/SAH were below normal initially and did not change significantly during the treatment period. A low value of GSH/GSSG indicates a state of oxidative stress, and a low value of SAM/SAH indicates lower than normal capacity for performing methylation reactions.

    The fact that improvements in several of the measured parameters were still occurring after 6 months of treatment and that the GSH/GSSG and SAM/SAH ratios continued to be low at that time suggests that a longer duration of treatment would produce additional benefit (and in fact, this was observed in the subsequent 3-month treatment period that included additional individualized treatments beyond the protocol used in this study).

    The initial exacerbation of symptoms that was experienced by over half of the patients may have resulted from mobilization of stored toxins, and well as toxins produced in the die-off of pathogens. Since the methylation cycle operation, the folate cycle operation, and the glutathione status were all improved, it can be expected that both the detoxication system and the immune system moved toward more normal operation, because their operation depends to a large degree on these parts of the overall biochemistry. During their extended Illnesses, it can be expected that toxins and pathogens had accumulated in the bodies of the patients, and that there would therefore have been considerable mobilization of toxins into the blood stream when these systems began functioning more normally. Because the rates of excretion into the stools, urine and perspiration are limited, the resulting elevation in toxin levels in the blood can be expected to impact tissue cells, leading to a variety of detoxication-related symptoms.

    Though there was (mostly mild) initial exacerbation of symptoms in over half the patients, the symptomatic improvement in at least two thirds of the patients was the dominant effect of the treatment. There was a significant decrease (by nearly half) in the average number of symptoms after 6 months of treatment, and significant improvements in all five of the self-rated symptomatic outcome measures. Four of the self-rated measures showed monotonic improvement with treatment time. The rating of overall feeling of wellbeing at 6 months was lower than the value to which it had risen at 3 months, but this decrease was not statistically significant.

    The fact that treatment of this type produced improvement in the whole range of symptoms experienced in CFS is evidence that the partial block at methionine synthase is fundamental to the pathophysiology of CFS, and this is consistent with the central feature of the GD-MCB hypothesis.

    Limitations of this Study

    The principal limitations of this study, being a preliminary, open label study, were that it was not blinded, randomized or placebo-controlled, it was limited in size to 21 patients (who met the strict selection criteria) in a single practice, and the duration of uniform treatment was limited to 6 months.

    Because they funded their own office visits and supplements, the patients may have been biased toward achieving a positive outcome.

    However, objective testing was used in addition to self-evaluation of symptoms, and the magnitudes of the improvements observed were sufficient to produce statistically significant results even in a study with relatively modest statistical power.

    Additional, more controlled study will be necessary to determine whether these improvements will continue to stand when possible sources of bias that are inherent in a preliminary study of this type are subject to control, and also to determine to what degree the results can be generalized to the CFS population as a whole.

    It is not possible to determine from this study what the ultimate degree of improvement might be from this treatment, or how long a duration of treatment would be required before either no further improvement (or, more optimistically, even complete recovery) would be observed. As noted above, it appears that longer duration of treatment would be desirable in future studies in order to realize the full potential of this treatment.

    It should also be pointed out that this treatment has not been optimized for CFS, and it is therefore likely that it could be improved by controlled studies. Nevertheless, the results of this study suggest that the treatment that was used does contain the essence of what is needed to correct what appears to be a fundamental aspect of the biochemical abnormalities of CFS.


    The results of this study are consistent with the predictions of the Glutathione Depletion—Methylation Cycle Block hypothesis for the pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome. This hypothesis appears to be a good candidate for more detailed testing.

    A treatment based on this hypothesis and directed at supporting the methylation cycle was found to produce significant improvements in the levels of glutathione, metabolites in the methylation cycle and folate vitamers in this group of CFS patients. There was also a significant decrease in the number of symptoms and significant self-rated improvements in energy, sleep, mental clarity, freedom from pain, and overall feeling of wellbeing. Treatment to support the methylation cycle in CFS is promising, and should receive more controlled study.


    This work was sponsored by an anonymous donor as part of the effort of the Ratna Ling Working Group. The authors express their appreciation for this sponsorship. We also wish to acknowledge the help of Drs. Tapan Audhya, Amy Yasko, Jacob Teitelbaum, and Ritchie Shoemaker in planning this study. Management was provided by Kevin Joyce, and nursing support was provided by Neva Dix. We are very grateful to them as well. Finally, we extend special thanks to the patients who were willing to participate in this study.

    Disclaimers: The authors have no financial interest in the tests or supplements discussed in this paper. Although the treatment described in this paper consists only of food supplements, it has not yet been widely tested in chronic fatigue syndrome, and it must be entered upon only under the supervision of a licensed physician, because adverse effects are possible in patients whose general health has become quite debilitated, or those who have certain respiratory, cardiac, endocrine or autoimmune conditions.

    Appendix—Symptom Checklist

    Confusion, disorientation
    Difficulty in word finding
    Impairment of concentration, difficulty assimilating new
    Reduced task completion
    Hypersensitivity to bright light
    Night blindness
    Tearing, redness of eyes
    Blurred vision
    Chronic aching muscles
    Joint pain, morning joint stiffness
    Pain in weight bearing joints
    Loss of appetite
    Weight gain (How much, and over what period of time?)
    Abdominal pain
    Chronic sinus congestion
    Chronic cough that mimics asthma
    Shortness of breath
    Ice-pick like pain, or electrical pain that shoots into a muscle
    Metallic taste or other unusual taste
    Vertigo, dizziness
    Ringing in the ears (tinnitus)
    Rage or inappropriate anger
    Panic attacks or anxiety
    Tingling, “needles and pins” sensation
    Increased sensitivity to touch
    Difficulty with sleep
    Difficulty with getting to sleep
    Difficulty with staying asleep
    Mood swings
    Excessive thirst or frequent urination
    Irregular vaginal bleeding
    Low body temperature
    Chronic yeast infections
    Onset of menopause (if appropriate)


    1. Van Konynenburg, R. A., Glutathione depletion—methylation cycle block, a hypothesis for the pathogenesis of chronic fatigue syndrome, poster paper, 8th Intl. Conf. on CFS, Fibromyalgia and Other Related Illnesses, IACFS, Fort Lauderdale, FL (January 10-14, 2007

    2. James, S.J., Cutler, P., Melnyk, S., Jernigan, S., Janak, L., Gaylor, D.W., and Neubrander, J.A., Metabolic biomarkers of increased oxidative stress and impaired methylation capacity in children with autism, Clin. Nutrit. (2004), 80: 1611-1617.

    3. Deth, R., Muratore, C., Benzecry, J., Power-Charnitsky, V.-A., and Waly, M., How environmental and genetic factors combine to cause autism: A redox/methylation hypothesis, NeuroToxicology (2008), 29: 190-201.

    4. Yasko, A., The Puzzle of Autism: Putting it All Together, 4th edition, Neurological Research Institute, Bethel, Maine (2006).

    5. Fukuda, K., Straus, S.E., Hickie, I., Sharpe, M.C., Dobbins, J.G., Komaroff, A., and the International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group, The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study, Ann. Intern. Med. (1994); 121: 953-959.

    6. Wolfe, F., Smythe, H.A., Yunus, M.B., Bennett, R.M., Bombardier, C., Goldenberg, D.L., et al., The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia, Arthritis and Rheumatism (1990); 33: 160-172.

    7. FolaPro is a registered trademark of Metagenics, Inc.

    8. Intrinsi B12/Folate is a registered trademark of Metagenics, Inc.

    9. General Vitamin Neurological Health Formula is formulated and supplied by Holistic Health Consultants LLC.

    10. Phosphatidyl Serine Complex is a product of Vitamin Discount Center.

    11. Activated B12 Guard is a registered trademark of Perque LLC.

    12. Vitamin Diagnostics, Inc., Cliffwood Beach, NJ.

    13. Quest Diagnostics, Lenexa, KS.

    14. Genetic Profiling Systems, LLC. Ordered from Holistic Health Associates, Bethel, Maine.

    15. Yasko, A., Genetic Bypass, Matrix Development Publishing Company, Payson, AZ (2005).

    16. LabCorp, Burlington, NC.

    17. Shoemaker, R.C., with Schaller, J., and Schmidt, P., Mold Warriors, Fighting America’s Hidden Health Threat, Gateway Press, Baltimore, MD (2005).

    18. Developed by Arthur P. Ginsberg, Ph.D. Licensed by Visumetrics Corp. Registered trademark of Stereo Optical Co., Inc.

    19. National Jewish Hospital, Denver, CO.

    20. Shoemaker, R.C., Giclas, P.C., Crowder, C., House, D. and Glovsky, M.M., Complement split products C3a and C4a are early markers of acute Lyme disease in tick bite patients in the United States, Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. (2008); 146(3): 255-261.

    21. Stricker, R.B., Savely, V.R., Motanya, N.C., and Giclas, P.C., Complement split products C3a and C4a in chronic Lyme disease, Scand. J. Immunol. (2009); 69(1): 64-69.

    22. Sorenson, B., Streib, J.E., Strand, M., Make, B., Giclas, P.C., Fleshner, M., and Jones, J.F., Complement activation in a model of chronic fatigue syndrome, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. (2003), 112(2): 397-403.

    23. Cambridge Biomedical Research Group, Brighton, MA

    24. Abbas, A.K., and Lichtman, A.H., Basic Immunology, third edition, Saunders, Philadelphia (2009), p. 270.

    25. Shoemaker, R.C., personal communication (2008).

    26. Chao, C.C., Janoff, E.N., Hu, S.X., Thomas, K., Gallagher, M., Tsang, M., and Peterson, P.K., Altered cytokine release in peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures fro patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome, Cytokine (1991), 3(4): 292-298.

    27. Peterson, P.K., Sirr, S.A., Grammith, F.C., Schenck, C.H., Pheley, A.M., Hu, S., and Chao, C.C., Effects of mild exercise on cytokines and cerebral blood flow in chronic fatigue syndrome patients, Clin. Diag. Lab. Immunol. (1994), 1(2): 222-226.

    28. MacDonald, K.L., Osterholm, M.T., LeDell, K.H., White, K.E., Schenck, C.H., Chao, C.C., Persing, D.H., Johnson, R.C., Barker, J.M., and Peterson, P.K., A case-control study to assess possible triggers and cofactors in chronic fatigue syndrome, Am. J. Med. (1996), 100(5): 548-554.

    29. Bennett, A.L., Chao, C.C., Hu, S., Buchwald, D., Fagioli, L.R., Schur, P.H., Peterson, P.K., and Komaroff, A.L., Elevation of bioactive transforming growth factor-beta in serum from patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, J. Clin. Immunol. (1997), 17(2): 160-166.

    30. Shin, H.Y., Shin, C.H., Shin, T.Y., Lee, E.J., and Kim, H.M., Effect of bojungikki-tang on lipopolysaccharide-induced cytokine production from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of chronic fatigue syndrome patients, Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. (2003), 25(4): 491-501.

    31. Kennedy, G., Spence, V., Underwood, C., and Belch, J.J.F., Increased neutrophil apoptosis in chronic fatigue syndrome, J. Clin. Pathol. (2004), 57: 891-893.

    32. Tomoda, A., Joudoi, T., Rabab, el-M., Matsumoto, T., Park, T.H., and Milke, T., Cytokine production and modulation: comparison of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome and normal controls, Psychiatry Res. (2005), 134(1): 101-104.

    33. Audhya, Ph.D., Director, Vitamin Diagnostics, Inc., personal communication (2008).

    34. Giustarini, D., Milzani, A., Dalle-Donne, I., and Rossi, R., Red blood cells as a physiological source of glutathione for extracellular fluids, Blood Cells Mol. Dis. (2008), 40(2): 174-179.

    35. Lomaestro, B.M., and Malone, M., Glutathione in health and disease: pharmacotherapeutic issues, Ann. Pharmacother. (1995), 29: 1263-1273.

    36. Droge, W., and Holm, E., Role of cysteine and glutathione in HIV infection and other diseases associated with muscle wasting and immunological dysfunction, FASEB J. (1997) 11:1077-1089.

    37. Cheney, P.R., Evidence of glutathione deficiency in chronic fatigue syndrome, American Biologics 11th International Symposium (1999), Vienna, Austria, Tape no. 07-199, available from Professional Audio Recording, P.O. Box 7455, LaVerne, CA 91750 (phone 1-800-227-4473).

    38. Cheney, P.R., Chronic fatigue syndrome, lecture presented to the CFIDS Support Group of Dallas-Fort Worth, Euless, TX, on May 15, 1999. Video tape available from Carol Sieverling, 513 Janann St., Euless, TX 76039.

    39. Enlander, D., personal communication, 2007.

    40. Salvato, P., CFIDS patients improve with glutathione injections, CFIDS Chronicle (Jan/Feb 1998).

    41. Richards, R.S., Roberts, T.K., Dunstan, R.H., McGregor, N.R., and Butt, H.L., Free radicals in chronic fatigue syndrome: cause or effect?, Redox Report (2000) 5 (2/3):146-147.

    42. Richards, R.S., Roberts, T.K., Mathers, D., Dunstan, R.H., McGregor, N.R., and Butt, H.L., Investigation of erythrocyte oxidative damage in rheumatoid arthritis and chronic fatigue syndrome, J. Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (2000), 6(1): 37-46.

    43. Manuel y Keenoy, B., Moorkens, G., Vertommen, J., Noe, M., Neve, J., and De Leeuw, I., Magnesium status and parameters of the oxidant-antioxidant balance in patients with chronic fatigue: effects of supplementation with magnesium, J. Amer. Coll. Nutrition (2000) 19(3):374-382.

    44. Fulle, S., Mecocci, P., Fano, G., Vecchiet, I., Vecchini, A., Racciotti, D., Cherubini, A., Pizzigallo, E., Vecchiet, L., Senin, U., and Beal, M.F., Specific oxidative alterations in vastus lateralis muscle of patients with the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome, Free Radical Biology and Medicine (2000) 29(12):1252-1259.
  2. AuntTammie

    AuntTammie New Member

    I appreciate you posting this. I just skimmed it now, but saved to to read more thoroughly soon. It's nice to have some hopeful news, and I am thankful for all the work you have done on this and all that you have posted about it before, too.
  3. skeptik2

    skeptik2 Member

    I'm with you!
  4. AuntTammie

    AuntTammie New Member

    Actually, nofool, your statement, "The % of patient with side effects are astronomically high: 53% with an initial worsening of symptoms. 20%, 13%, etc... A med with such a profile would never be marketed" is NOT accurate.....Even though these results are technically not side effects, I agree that worsening is not something desirable, so I'll ignore that part of it. However, there are a lot of meds with similar profiles on the market. In fact, most meds have profiles with certain side effects being reported by very high percentages of people, esp at the onset of treatment. And many of those meds are aimed solely at treating the symptoms, not actually improving the underlying cause. Some actually make the underlying cause the psych meds that harm the mitochondria.

    I'd rather be doing something to get rid of toxins than be masking the symptoms of those toxins by putting even more toxins in my body in the form of meds, esp meds that do have awful side effects, some of which can be permanent. I do believe that some meds do help some people, but a lot of them do an awful lot of harm, too. And, of course, as you said, conventional medicine won't buy this treatment, or many other alt treatments...they aren't profitable to the drug companies.
    [This Message was Edited on 03/18/2009]
    [This Message was Edited on 03/18/2009]
    [This Message was Edited on 03/18/2009]
  5. outofstep

    outofstep Member

    For posting this and also for trying to figure out the mechanism of CFS, especially since it seems to be a pretty thankless job. I appreciate anyone who uses a scientific approach to solve this problem when the dominant paradigm is that CFS is all in your head and is treated accordingly. We need more people like Rich who are from other disciplines and can see this disease in new ways.
  6. elliespad

    elliespad Member

    You said, The % of patient with side effects are astronomically high: 53% with an initial worsening of symptoms. 20%, 13%, etc... A med with such a profile would never be marketed.

    Hmmm, I wonder what % of patients experience NEW and PROFOUND worsening of symptoms when receiving Chemotherapy.

  7. SpecialK82

    SpecialK82 New Member

    Thank you so much for all your research and hard work - we can never thank you enough as a community for taking an interest in CFS.

    I am very interested in trying to unblock the methylation cycle but I am having trouble finding any physician that will support me in it.

    Do you possibly have a listing of physicians who are on board with the treatment? I live in Cincinnati, OH and am willing to travel within reason. Any direction you could point me in would be greatly appreciated!


  8. Forebearance

    Forebearance Member

    Thank you for sharing your paper with us, Rich!

    I'm glad you did that experiment. I'd like to see it in PDF format, also.

    One thing I'd like to add is that I'm not sure how accurate it is to call the initial bad feelings on the methylation protocol "worsening of symptoms". I don't think "side effects" is accurate either.

    My experience was that the initial detox symptoms on the simplified methylation supplements were a new set of symptoms that were not the same as my usual CFS symptoms. The only one that was similar was feeling more tired.

    Considering that these are inexpensive, nutritional, supportive supplements, it seems almost miraculous that they accomplish as much as they do. Thank you for figuring it out!


  9. deliarose

    deliarose New Member

    I just wanted to say I have been on some form of methylation support for 2 years & have made terrific progress.

    my body temp has improved, my blood pressure has improved, NK cell activity is up, (it was in the basement). I'm off sleep meds. I get very deep and refreshing sleep. It took 2 years but the cognitive function is much improved,. short term memory, concentration and processing, although there is still a lot of room for improvement or it still lags waaay behind what it was.

    Menstrual periods have normalised. Unfortunately, I was not tracking sex hormone levels or even thyroid hormone levels throughout my extended illness, so I can't really quote you numbers.

    It's been rather gruelling, partly because I took high doses ofhe folates.. which on reflection was probably not advisable...and I'm still not that functional. Can't work. Still have to rest periodically etc. I'm prettty sure my adrenals are shot. (24-hr cortisol saliva test.)

    But I am not the zombie I was a coupla years ago, with horrible brain fog, constant fatigue, no short term memory, often confused by simple conversations, feeling like the world was in warp mode and I was stuck in suspended animation.

    I've just run my 3rd vitamin diagnostics panel.. and the first 2 show progress in teh right direction.

    This is just fyi. I am not a doctor and I do not play one on TV. Your mileage may vary. It's advisable to do this under the supervision of a doctor ..blah,blah, blah.

    I also think that ppl, like me, who have been sick a long time, will need LARGE doses of hydroxycobalamin B12. I do not think a coupla of sublinguals a day will cut it.. although I guess it's better than nothing.

    Anyone interested in this approach should probably join the cfs_yasko yahoo group.


  10. acer2000

    acer2000 New Member


    Did you measure NK cell number and function as part of the study? I didn't see where you mentioned that. Also, is there an alternative to taking the PS/PC/PE for someone who is allergic to soy?
  11. richvank

    richvank New Member

    Hi, Aunt Tammie.

    You are very welcome. I hope this study will be of help to you.

  12. richvank

    richvank New Member

    Hi, nofool.

    My responses are at the asterisks below:

    "Sixteen of 30 patients (53%) reported an initial worsening of symptoms, beginning in most of these cases within 3 or 4 days, but in some cases beginning at up to 2 weeks. Most of the symptoms were mild, and none of the patients discontinued usage of the supplements during the first 3 months. The most common side effects were gastrointestinal (pain, cramps, constipation, or diarrhea), reported by 6 out of 30 patients or 20%; increase in pain, reported by 4 out of 30 or 13%; and increase in fatigue, reported by 3 out of 30 or 10%. Other symptoms, reported by one patient each, were a decrease in appetite, poor sleep, weak legs, flu-like symptoms, and an increase in anxiety and depression."

    The % of patient with side effects are astronomically high: 53% with an initial worsening of symptoms. 20%, 13%, etc... A med with such a profile would never be marketed.

    ***Yes, these are high numbers, and I think they correspond fairly well with the reports from people on this board who have tried this treatment over the past two plus years. I think there are drugs with very high rates of side effects, but they are justified on the basis that they also have effects that are argued to be beneficial, usually lessening one or more symptoms, or on the basis that there are no alternatives. I won't mention specific drugs, but I could.

    I know that you can blame the side effects on "toxins", but conventional med doesn't buy it -- and neither do I.

    ***I'm sorry that you feel this way. With my current understanding of the pathogenesis of CFS, which I believe is borne out by the results of this clinical study, I don't believe that a true recovery from CFS is possible without a period of detox and die-off. The reason is that the detoxication system and the immune system are dysfunctional during the entire time the person has been ill, so that toxins and infections have accumulated. There is no magic way to rid the body of all of this instantaneously. Antibiotics, antivirals and antifungals can help to kill off the pathogens, and chelators can help to take out some of the toxins, but a lot of this has to be handled by the detoxication system after it has been brought back into operation.

    For those whom still believe in your treatment, please answer this simple question: When will conventional medicine "see the science" behind your treatment, and accept it as legitimate? Or, do you think that it will always dwell in the world of alt med, to rise and fall with current trends/fads?

    ***I don't think that will be up to me. I do what I can to get the word out to conventional doctors, complementary doctors, and alternative doctors alike. As you know, M.D.s are trained in medical school to use drugs to treat disease. Unless they make a decision to broaden this perspective, they will continue to look for a licensed drug to treat CFS. I might add that I have met quite a few who have gotten beyond their early indoctrination in this regard.

    ***At the IACFS/ME conference, there was a very mixed group, as in the past. There were the conventional doctors who continue to look for a drug to solve the problem, and many of them did not come to the poster session to see my posters or those of many other researchers. Their view seems to be that anything of importance will be covered in the oral talks, and any real solution to CFS will come in the form of a licensed drug that has been through a randomized, doubly-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of extended length and including a large number of patients. That's what they have been taught to look for.

    ***This indoctrination at medical schools may be changing, however. As you may know, the medical students at both Stanford and Harvard medical schools have recently risen up against the dominance of the curriculum by the pharmaceutical companies. They suspect that many of their professors may not be completely objective, because of the income they are receiving by promoting drugs for the drug companies. As a case in point, in the syllabus for this conference, one of the leading M.D.s of the IACFS/ME declared connections with a large collection of the bigger drug companies. I'll let you judge for yourself whether you think a person in that position is going to open their thinking to non-drug treatments that may cut into the sales of patented antidepressants and pain killers.

    On the other hand, there were also patients, parents of patients, support group leaders, naturopaths, O.D.'s, complementary M.D.'s, alternative M.D.'s and others. Many from these groups were very interested in the methylation cycle treatment. At one point, I was trying to answer questions from three people at once, and others were waiting to ask theirs. I gave away 100 hard copies of my paper, and even gave away the poster copy itself on the last day, and received another request after that. I also have lists of people who asked for emailed copies. A few patients dropped by to say that they had already been trying the treatment and that it was helping them. So there was a very striking contrast.

    There was a major turnover in the board of the IACFS/ME at this conference, so we may see a broader policy in future conferences. Time will tell.

    Best regards,

  13. richvank

    richvank New Member

    Hi, anchorholds.

    I'm not able to give individual treatment advice unless a physician is directly involved to review my suggestions. Generally speaking, I think that treatment to lift the methylation cycle block, if present, is the most promising approach to treatment. The reason is that I believe that this is the basic abnormality in the biochemistry in CFS. As can be seen from the results of the clinical study, glutathione levels came up as a consequence of lifting the methylation cycle block. We did not supplement glutathione directly, but it came up as a result of the treatment earlier in the sulfur metabolism.

    With regard to the heart cell mitochondria, two of the substances needed by them are carnitine and Co Q10, and these both require methylation. So I think that the key is to lift the partial block in the methylation cycle, and the other downstream issues will resolve themselves. Going low and slow with the dosages is important, and based on experience, my position continues to be that it is necessary to be monitored by a licensed physician while on this treatment, since there have been a small number of reports on this board of adverse effects that required the attention of a physician.

  14. richvank

    richvank New Member

    Hi, outofstep.

    You're very welcome. I hope this study pays off for you.

  15. richvank

    richvank New Member

    Hi, caledonia.

    I'll look into how to do the conversion. I'm not very computer-savvy, but maybe it's easy to do.

    I suspect that the problem in reading it with an early version of Word is that it has figures that were imported into the paper as bitmaps from a plotting program (Dplot). Earlier versions of Word may not tolerate that.

  16. richvank

    richvank New Member

    Hi, SpecialK82.

    You're quite welcome.

    If you email me at richvank at aol dot com, I will send you some names of physicians. I prefer not to do it on a public board, because some of the state medical boards tend to go after the licenses of doctors who do not stick to the "standard of care," which tends to be antidressants for CFS.

  17. richvank

    richvank New Member

    Hi, forebearance.

    You are certainly welcome! Thank you for being one of the pioneers in trying this treatment.

    I will look into doing a pdf conversion of the paper.

    Thanks for the personal experience and insight on the symptoms. I haven't known quite how to refer to them. I'd like to refer to them as detox and die-off symptoms, because I believe that's what they are, but in a scientific paper there has to be evidence for everything one says, and it's hard to prove that that's what they are.

    I think that if there were stronger incentives to determine the root causes of other chronic diseases, it might be possible to treat them with specific, targeted natural substances, too. As it is, the financial incentives are in favor of not figuring out root causes, but patenting drugs that will ameliorate symptoms enough that people will want them. Cures would cut into business.

  18. richvank

    richvank New Member

    Hi, delia.

    Thanks for the personal testimony and update on your condition. Also, thank you very much for being PWC number 1 on this treatment. I also would like very much to see you become totally well, both for your sake, and because I'm grateful for what you did, and because you are the frontrunner and "poster person." There may be some additional things that would pay off. I know you've been looking for them. Running the methylation panel again is a good idea, because it can give clues about what still needs to be done.

    You started a revolution, and this clinical study was a natural progression from what you started. I'm hoping that this study will now lead to the next step, which would be to attract researchers who are properly placed to be able to get funded to run a more controlled trial. They now have evidence that they would be choosing a "sure thing." The difficulty is the funding. The CDC is not chartered to test this type of treatment. The NIH is, but they don't have the money in their budget for CFS. The CFIDS Association probably won't have enough money for a full-fledged clinical trial, though they are planning to try to raise more. The Whittemore-Peterson Institute is focusing primarily on virus and genetic research. The IACFS/ME is trying to raise money to support research, but so far, they have been dominated by the drug paradigm. So I don't know where the money would come from. Our private donor for this study is not likely to come up with it. I guess we need another one!


  19. richvank

    richvank New Member

    Hi, Aaron.

    No, we didn't measure anything related to the NK cells. It would have been great to have been able to measure those parameters as well as quite a few others, but we didn't have the budget to do it.

    Several people have raised the PS/PC/PE issue. Most of them have been concerned that the phosphatidyl serine would further lower their low cortisol. I still don't have a good answer for that question.

    In the case of soy allergy, I think Amy Yasko recommends Seriphos, which is soy-free. However, if that would lower cortisol, it might not be the best for some people.

    I spoke with Dr. Andy Neville at the conference, and he uses Seriphos in cases where cortisol is high, but he seemed to think that in the long run it will be beneficial in other cases, also.

    One of the main reasons for a supplement of this type in the treatment is to support the phospholipid membranes, which have sustained considerable damage in CFS because of the oxidative stress. A supplement containing unsaturated fatty acids would probably help. Omega-3 fatty acids would probably be most important, because they are the ones that are most vulnerable to damage by oxidative stress. Fish oil would be a possibility, I think.

  20. panthere

    panthere Member

    I am so excited to start this treatment now!! I think this is the answer for me! :) YAY!

[ advertisement ]