Vit. D: new findings

Discussion in 'Fibromyalgia Main Forum' started by victoria, Jun 19, 2010.

  1. victoria

    victoria New Member

    The rush to get higher blood level of D may not be all that great. Again, there's a lot of conflicting findings, but this is from the NIH.

    If higher levels actually seem to contribute to pancreatic cancer and negligible positive effect anyway with other cancers, I have to wonder about taking such high dosages and its effect on other 'thing' in our bodies. Fat-soluble things are nothing to mess around with, IMHO.
    Friday, June 18, 2010
    12:01 a.m. EDT
    NCI Press Officers, 301-496-6641
    Vitamin D Status is Not Associated with Risk for Less Common Cancers

    Despite hopes that higher blood levels of vitamin D might reduce cancer risk, a large study finds no protective effect against non-Hodgkin lymphoma or cancer of the endometrium, esophagus, stomach, kidney, ovary, or pancreas. In this study, carried out by researchers from the National Cancer Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health, and many other research institutions, data based on blood samples originally drawn for 10 individual studies were combined to investigate whether people with high levels of vitamin D were less likely to develop these rarer cancers. Details of these analyses appear as a set of papers in the June 18, 2010, online issue of the American Journal of Epidemiology, and in print in the July 2010 issue.

    "We did not see lower cancer risk in persons with high vitamin D blood concentrations compared to normal concentrations for any of these cancers," said Demetrius Albanes, M.D., NCI, one of the study investigators. "And, at the other end of the vitamin D spectrum, we did not see higher cancer risk for participants with low levels."

    As part of a collaborative effort of the NCI Cohort Consortium, investigators from the Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers examined vitamin D levels in blood that had been collected from over 12,000 men and women participating in one of the studies. Some of those individuals went on to develop cancer. Vitamin D concentrations were measured using 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), which is the major form of this vitamin in the bloodstream.

    Participants were followed for the development of cancer for up to 33 years, depending on the study. Investigators then compared cancer rates in participants whose levels of vitamin D in stored blood were high (above 75 nmol/L, or nanomoles per liter) or low (less than 25 nmol/L) with rates in participants whose levels of vitamin D were within the normal range (50 to 75 nmol/L).

    For the small number of participants with vitamin D levels greater than 100 nmol/L, investigators observed elevated risk of pancreatic cancer, but not for the other cancers in these studies. They recommended further research to clarify this relationship.

    Vitamin D is made naturally by the body when the skin is exposed to sunlight; it can also be obtained from a few foods in which it occurs naturally, from fortified foods, and from nutritional supplements. Vitamin D is essential for healthy bones, calcium absorption, and immune function.

    Researchers and clinicians have looked to the possibility that vitamin D might be used for cancer prevention. Some evidence indicates that higher levels of vitamin D are associated with a lower risk of colorectal cancer, though the evidence is inconsistent.

    Through the Vitamin D Pooling Project, researchers had access to a geographically and demographically diverse group of men and women, including participants from the United States, Finland, and China.

    In this collection of groups of study participants, the proportion of the study population that was deficient in vitamin D varied from 3 percent to 36 percent, depending on geographical latitude, season during which the blood was collected, race, and other factors. The investigators had a wealth of other information on participants, including smoking history, lifestyle, and diet. As in other studies, individuals with higher 25(OH)D levels were more likely to be male, lean, and physically active. Those with higher levels also reported greater intake of multivitamins, calcium supplements, and foods rich in vitamin D.

    "In this pooled analysis of cohort data, vitamin D was not associated with lower risk for these less common cancers, despite well-established benefits for bone health," concluded Albanes.

    Many people in the United States and around the world have low concentrations of 25(OH)D. The current recommended daily intake of vitamin D to maintain bone health and normal calcium metabolism, according to the Food and Nutrition Board of the Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, ranges from 200 IU (international units) to 600 IU, depending on age, with the highest dose recommendations being for the elderly. In addition, the 2005 Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommends that older adults, people with dark skin, and those exposed to insufficient sunlight consume extra vitamin D from vitamin D-fortified foods and/or supplements. Since there are very few foods which naturally contain vitamin D (fatty fish, fish liver oil, and eggs), most dietary vitamin D comes from fortified foods such as milk, juice, yogurt, bread and breakfast cereals.

    NCI's Cohort Consortium ( was established in 2000 to foster large collaborative studies, such as the Vitamin D Pooling Project, to investigate the causes of cancer, including interactions between genes, between genes and the environment, and between multiple environmental factors.

    The Vitamin D Pooling Project realizes a major goal and advantage of the Cohort Consortium — the study of rare cancer outcomes that no one cohort alone can examine effectively. The Project's Steering Committee representing the 10 cohorts included researchers from NCI; the American Cancer Society; Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston; Mercy Medical Center and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore; New York University School of Medicine, New York City; University of Hawaii, Honolulu; and Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville.
    NCI leads the National Cancer Program and the NIH effort to dramatically reduce the burden of cancer and improve the lives of cancer patients and their families, through research into prevention and cancer biology, the development of new interventions, and the training and mentoring of new researchers. For more information about cancer, please visit the NCI Web site at or call NCI's Cancer Information Service at 1-800-4-CANCER (1-800-422-6237).

    The National Institutes of Health (NIH) — The Nation's Medical Research Agency — includes 27 Institutes and Centers and is a component of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It is the primary federal agency for conducting and supporting basic, clinical and translational medical research, and it investigates the causes, treatments, and cures for both common and rare diseases. For more information about NIH and its programs, visit

    Nine papers, all appearing in the American Journal of Epidemiology, online June 18, 2010, and in print in the July 2010 issue:

    Overview of the Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers. Kathy J. Helzlsouer for the VDPP Steering Committee.

    Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and Risk of Esophageal and Gastric Cancer: Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers. Abnet C.C., Chen Yu, et. al.

    Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer: Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers. Stolzenberg-Solomon R, Jacobs EJ,

    Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and Risk of Kidney Cancer: Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers. Gallicchio L, Moore LE, et. al.

    Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and the Risk of Rarer Cancers: Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers Design and Methods. Gallicchio L, Helzlsouer KJ, et. al.

    Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and Risk of Endometrial Cancer: Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers. Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Gallicchio L, et. al.

    Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers. Zheng W, Danforth KN, et. al.

    Circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and Risk of non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers. Purdue MP, Michal Freedman D, et. al.

    Correlates of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D: Cohort Consortium Vitamin D Pooling Project of Rarer Cancers. McCullough ML, Weinstein SJ, et. al.
  2. Misfit101

    Misfit101 New Member

    Wow victoria...great info. Thanks for posting it. I take 1000 iu of d3 every day. I dont think that puts me in the mega doses. It does make me feel better overall. Not so dragged out. Thats very interesting.
  3. TigerLilea

    TigerLilea Active Member

    The Vitamin D Council responded to this press release earlier today.

    >>>Vitamin D Council Studies such as the one written about below confuse the public and erroneously discredit vitamin D. The way the study was designed, only a single blood test was done and the subjects were then followed for decades. This is problematic as that one blood test does not accurately predict who will maintain adequate vitamin d levels, and thus, receive its benefit.<<<

    They make a good point that if people were given blood tests only once and then followed for 33 years without further testing, who knows how accurate the results really were. It is a known fact that as people age, they absorb less vitamin D from the sun. Also, in the past 20 years, we have been warned of the dangers of skin cancer and advised to stay out of the sun, especially the noon sun which is when the body derives the most benefit as far as vitamin D goes.

    The Canadian MS Society is now recommending that women take 2,000 IU of Vitamin D3 during child bearing years and for newborns to 5 years old to also be taking the same amount. They believe that MS will be virtially wiped out in 20 years time if people follow this advice.
  4. victoria

    victoria New Member

    It will be an interesting experiment, albeit very long term.

    It is odd if they never took another sample. Wonder why the NIH is publishing this.